![]() About 10 years ago it fired its entire development staff and replaced them with programmers who had no experience with sheet music. Since it is not under active development (apparently), it feels like a sinking ship. And as the years went on, it caught up in terms of features and power.Īt the same time, it is starting to run into the same problem I mentioned above with Finale though perhaps not quite as bad. ![]() It is not as old as Finale and when it was being developed, they took care to improve upon the experience making, arguable, a better user experience than you find in Finale. Old people don't like to switch tools unless they have to. That said, it is still widely used in academia but mainly among older professors. Consensus seems to be that Finale is too old and since it does not appear to be under active development, it's hard to recommend it these days. There's always a fine line between being too old and needing to start over and being old enough to be powerful enough. Old program often have features that no one else has, but they also often have code bases that are so hacked together that it is difficult to improve upon them. It should also help provide a more granular control than using solely the system volume.Finale: Old, semi-active development. Using these sliders rather than the system volume on its own could help prevent sudden changes in volume when moving between Finale and other applications. In the event that the steps above do not resolve this issue, we would recommend utilizing the volume faders in the VST Banks
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |